You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Mucosal immunotherapy targeting APC in lung disease

Abstract

Several studies have demonstrated that the pulmonary immune response is primarily facilitated by antigen-presenting cells (APCs), and that both professional and non-professional APCs contribute to overall pulmonary immunity. APCs play unique roles and mechanisms in pathogen elimination and immunomodulation. Mucosal immunity exhibits potential advantages over traditional parenteral immunity in that it stimulates immune defenses in mucosal and systemic tissues, which is important for reducing the burden of lung disease. However, obtaining a comprehensive understanding of the crosstalk between mucosal immunity and APC in the context of various lung diseases remains challenging. This mini-review aimed to elucidate the mechanisms of novel mucosal immunity, targeting APC action during lung infections, allergies, and malignant tumorigenesis. This minreview provides important insights into more effective therapeutic approaches for various lung diseases.

Introduction

Specialized APCs are known for their ability to present exogenous antigens to T cells such as dendritic cells (DCs), macrophages (Møs), and B cells. When dendritic cells (DCs) detect and capture proteins that are either immunogenic or linked to activating molecules, they experience a change in their phenotype and move toward the lymph nodes. In these nodes, they display peptides derived from proteins using MHC-I and MHC-II molecules to antigen-specific CD8 + and CD4 + T cells [1]. After an infection occurs, conventional dendritic cells type 1 (cDC1s) relocate from their intraepithelial origins to the draining mediastinal lymph nodes and are typically recognized as the main subset responsible for cross-presenting antigens to CD8 + T cells. Conversely, conventional dendritic cells type 2 (cDC2s) assist in priming CD4 + T cells, while plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) are primarily noted for their synthesis of type I interferons [2]. The process of polarization in lung macrophages is dynamic and influenced by a range of environmental factors. In cases of bacterial infections or inflammatory states, macrophages generally polarize towards the M1 phenotype, leading to the considerable secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines. In contrast, during chronic infections or heightened inflammatory reactions, these cells might transition to the M2 phenotype, which aids in tissue healing and reduces inflammation by promoting immune tolerance [3, 4]. Alveolar macrophages carry out immunoregulatory tasks by generating soluble mediators that suppress the activity of dendritic cells. Nevertheless, if the macrophage-surfactant-epithelial barrier is compromised, antigens may penetrate to reach deeper sentinel dendritic cells. This can result in modifications to the local cytokine milieu and promote dendritic cell activation, initiating adaptive immune responses. Furthermore, interstitial macrophages have the capability to process antigens into smaller peptides and then present them on the surfaces of adjacent dendritic cells, thereby boosting the immune activity of lung dendritic cells [5]. However, nonspecialized APCs are also capable of antigen presentation including endothelial cells (ECs) and epithelial cells, whose mechanisms have recently been investigated [6,7,8].

Pharmaceuticals aimed at the nasal cavity primarily influence the respiratory mucosa along with the nasal-associated lymphoid tissue (NALT) [9]. The immune mechanisms within the nasal mucosa are divided into inductive and effector locations. Inductive sites are mainly composed of mucosal lymphoid follicles situated in the respiratory zone, commonly known as NALT. Effector sites are responsible for the activation of B cell and T cell immune responses [10]. Surrounding the NALT are epithelial cells and a small quantity of microfold cells. The base of microfold cells is rich in B cells, T cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells (DC). These microfold cells act as multifunctional transporters, facilitating the nonspecific and specific endocytosis of antigens that are displayed on their outer membrane, thereby aiding in the delivery of these antigens to antigen-presenting cells [11]. Immune cells activated by antigens can traverse the bloodstream and participate in both mucosal immunity and systemic immune responses, which are marked by the production of immunoglobulin A (IgA) and immunoglobulin G (IgG), respectively [12]. Mucosal vaccines, including intranasal and intestinal vaccines, not only inhibit infection and prevent the progression of inflammatory diseases but also prevent infection from occurring while targeting tumor cells. Furthermore, mucosal vaccines are advanced by the discovery of safe and effective mucosal adjuvants combined with innovative antigens and exploration of their mechanisms of action [13, 14]. Adjuvants are an integral component of most vaccine formulations, as suitable adjuvants facilitate the promotion of appropriate immune responses against target pathogens at both the innate and adaptive levels [15]. Respiratory immunity offers unique advantages such as the induction of systemic and mucosal responses to prevent respiratory infections. However, the upper respiratory tract is susceptible to infections that endanger the lower respiratory tract due to the invasion of various microorganisms and allergens through the nose and mouth. Therefore, upper respiratory tract-specific defense mechanisms are important [10, 16]. Nasal vaccines can activate immune cells located in the mucosal tissues of the upper and lower respiratory tracts to produce dual stimulation, and this, together with needle-free administration, is conducive to the development of new nasal vaccines to produce long-lasting immunity and improve patient compliance [17]. This mini-review aimed to reveal novel mucosal immunotherapies targeting professional APC versus nonprofessional APC in pulmonary lung diseases, and may contribute to a deeper understanding of the potential immunological role of APC in lung diseases and development of therapeutic directions.

Lung disease treatment: a novel mucosal vaccine that crosstalks APCs

Over time, extensive research has explored the unique role of APC in various diseases. In this study, we review mucosal immunotherapies targeting APC lungs from innocuous to deleterious pathogens and anti-tumors.

Allergic diseases

Asthma is a complex disease that usually occurs during childhood [18]. Epithelial cells serve as natural barriers, while corticosteroids, routinely used to treat asthma, improve epithelial function and enhance the integrity of epithelial tight junctions by inducing pro-calmodulin-1. This reinforces the first line of defense against harmless stimuli, such as allergens [19]. ECs, another type of nonspecialized APC, have many innate immune functions performed by Møs, including antigen presentation, and pro- and anti-inflammatory functions, and are important in regulating the differentiation of monocytes into Møs and DCs [20, 21]. Upon exposure to allergens, pulmonary ECs initiate an immune response and coordinate with DCs to induce and enhance adaptive Th2 immunity and type 2 (T2) cytokine production. Steroids not only enhance epithelial integrity, but are also highly sensitive to T2 inflammation, making inhaled corticosteroids the cornerstone of allergic asthma treatment [22,23,24]. TSLP, a Th2-associated cytokine, is resistant to corticosteroid therapy [25]. The nasal prophylactic vaccine antigen P1 (a conserved region of the HIV-1 gp41 envelope glycoprotein) induces TSLP production when interacting with the nasal epithelium, thus further affecting humoral and cellular antigen-specific responses; caution must be used when utilizing it as an adjuvant to a mucosal vaccine against HIV or tuberculosis in patients with asthma. Caution should be exercised when used as an adjuvant for HIV or TB mucosal vaccines in patients with asthma [26]. For the treatment of corticosteroid-resistant non-allergic asthma, ceramide nanoliposomes are used to treat corticosteroid-resistant non-allergic asthma by limiting cell growth through inactivation of the AKT pathway, which is controlled by a potent epithelial growth factor [27]. Nanoprobes containing an inhibitor of colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor, which targets epithelial cell production, can also be used to eliminate the production of allergen-reactive IgE, thereby preventing new asthma attacks and reversing already present allergic lung inflammation [28].Vaccines formulated with a hydrogel delivery system reduces eosinophilic inflammation and airway remodeling, including that of epithelial cells [29]. The airway administration of OM-85 targets multiple innate and adaptive immune pathways to suppress allergic asthma, including the Streptococcus-dependent airway epithelial/IL-33/ILC2 axis in fungal infections, pulmonary allergeninduced T2 responses, and dendritic cells. It is administered at a lower dose than current oral treatments [30].

Pulmonary infection

A recent study used PVM, the murine equivalent of pneumococcal respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), to develop a novel moues model of RSV coinfection. In this model, PVM infection increases the density of pneumococci in the nasopharyngeal space and accelerates the early stages of pneumococcal transmission. However, there was a reduction in PVM load in the upper respiratory tract of mice with pneumococcal infection [31]. In addition to the observation that flora interacts with each other, fully inactivated influenza, pneumococcal vaccines, and live influenza vaccines combined with recombinant peptides, derived from streptococcal surface factors, enhance pneumococcalspecific responses when co-administered using the nasal cavity. Crosstalk between the pathogen and vaccine influences the immune action of APCs and development of better vaccine strategies for these two pathogens [32, 33].

viral infection

RSV infections during infancy are highly associated with the risk of childhood asthma [34]. Although most acute respiratory viral infections, such as influenza, elicit a longlasting immune response, RSV infections result in relatively short-lived protective immunity and can repeatedly infect the host without antigenic alterations. [35] Conversely, DCs initiate the immune response by first crossing the EC barrier to reach the peripheral tissues, where they uptake antigens through chemokines, and subsequently cross the lymphatic endothelium to enter the T-cell region of the draining lymph nodes [36]. Among them, cDC2s are attracted to and activated by alertin, which is secreted by PAMPstimulated airway epithelial cells and activates T helper cells mainly by presenting viral antigens on MHC II [37]. The combination of DC-targeted therapy with vaccination may have additive or synergistic effects, ultimately treating RSV infections with minimal side effects [38]. The TLR5 ligand flagellin is most potent in activating neonatal lung APCs, inducing a significant elevation in the expression of maturation markers for the cDC1 and cDC2 subpopulations. This unique efficiency suggests its potential use as a potent adjuvant for early mucosal vaccines in infancy for most infections, including those caused by respiratory syncytial and influenza viruses [39]. Interestingly, non-mucosal (intramuscular) inoculation with an IFN-1-inducing adjuvant promotes the release of CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 from alveolar endothelial and epithelial cells. This leads to the recruitment of CXCR3-expressing pDCs to the lungs and successfully enhances antigen-specific IgA production in intranasally sensitized vaccines [40].

Lung CD8 + memory T cells play a central role in influenza, and in a study where mice were immunized subcutaneously with ovalbumin antigen complexed with complete Fuchs’ adjuvant, then boosted by intranasal OVA administration, AM directed the rapid expansion of antigen-specific CD8 + T cells in the lungs whereas cDC1 deficiency had no significant effect [41]. In contrast, intranasal IFN- inhalation was observed in a mouse model of infection, directing the migration and function of cDC1 to develop an optimal anti-viral response consisting of specific CD8 + T cells [42]. This may be due to differences in the pathways that stimulate CD8 + T cell expansion. The intranasal delivery of SIIN-Q11 nanofibers triggers long-lived memory CD8 + T cells in situ in the lungs via cDC1 and cDC2 crossover, precedes the drainage of mediastinal lymph nodes (mLNs) [43]. Intranasal immunisation induces robust systemic and mucosal immune responses with secretory IgA and IgG preventing influenza infection at the site of viral entry. Secretory IgA is produced by subepithelial plasma cells, and is translocated to the apical surface of airway epithelial cells via polymeric immunoglobulin receptors that prevent the adhesion of airborne microorganisms [44]. The chitosan-functionalized iron oxide nano-enzymatic adjuvanted fully inactivated influenza virus, catalyzes DC maturation, and enhances antigen presentation leading to increased IgA mucosal adaptive immunity [45]. Riboflavin, a safe and inexpensive food additive, induces the phenotypic and functional maturation of DCs as an adjuvant for the fully inactivated influenza virus, enhancing the IgA and IgG levels [46]. Adjuvant influenza virus recombinant neuraminidase proteins are much safer as intranasal primary and booster immunization than an intranasal vaccination with live attenuated influenza vaccines [47]. As the primary antibody class in blood and extracellular fluids IgG monomers fuse to influenza virus hemagglutinin antigens in the trimerized structural domains and CpG adjuvants, for intranasal immunization, bind to the receptor and mediate the transport of IgG antibodies across the epithelium, protecting against lethal influenza virus attack. Among them, CpG oligonucleotides are widely used in the laboratory and are recognized as potent mucosal immunomodulators [48, 49]. Graphene oxide nanoparticles have recently been demonstrated to be comparable to CpG, providing a new direction in adjuvant application. However, as secreted IgA is more broadly reactive than IgG, it is an important component of the protective regimen of graphene oxide nanoparticles against various influenza virus infections [50]. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) shows promise for utilization in influenza virus studies. Sialylated IgG promotes the expression of nuclear REST, dampens NF-κB signaling, and triggers anti-inflammatory reactions, which aids in reducing lung inflammation and alleviating severe cases of influenza. This domain seems to present significant prospects for additional investigation [51].

The alum adjuvant is cytotoxic to the alveoli, causing necrotic apoptosis of alveolar epithelial cells, resulting in the production of IL-33 to induce Th2 immunity and increased expression of MHC class II in antigen-presenting cells in the lungs [52]. Thus, enhancing antigen-specific IgA antibody production. It was observed that alum itself causes lung injury, and that the absence of antibodydependent potentiation effects, which ensures safety, creates new challenges for the use of conventional alum adjuvants. In recent studies, pertussis colonization factor A with alum as an adjuvant for a vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) surfacespiking protein, triggers systemic and mucosal Th1/17-polarized immune responses. The interaction between the two reduced respiratory tract injuries. [53] whereas a shift from the conventional microscale alum adjuvant to a nanoscale reduced the risk of antibody-dependent potentiation, preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection in a highly effective manner [54]. The mechanism of antigen delivery by respirable coronavirus mimetic particles encoded by spiny proteins involves rapid binding to and internalization by alveolar macrophages as immunization in vivo increases mucosal IgA levels [55]. Additionally, mucosal vaccines with C5aR ligand Co1 peptide adjuvanted spicatin acting as antigen target monocyte-derived lysogenic DCs improves vaccination efficiency [56]. The main target for the development of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is not only spicatin but also the receptorbinding domain of spicatin that induces potent neutralizing antibodies and contains a major T-cell epitope that is important for viral entry into the target cell [57]. The modified porous silica particulate adjuvant and receptor-binding domain vaccine enhanced the uptake of SARS-CoV-2 antigen by nasal and airway epithelial cells, ultimately triggering a stronger immune response [58]. Furthermore, targeting DCs with a Clec9A-receptor-binding domain antibody construct specifically expressed on cDC1 induced higher specific antibody titers and prolonged the duration of vaccine action in vivo, thus providing robust and sustained systemic and mucosal protective immunity against the rapidly evolving SARS-CoV2 variant [59]. The optimized synthesis of the Shiga toxin B subunit as a protein antigen delivery vehicle targeting DCs was also investigated for its beneficial properties against the new, highly malignant variant [60, 61]. The fusion of a formyl peptide receptor-like 1 inhibitory protein to a spiny protein and an adjuvant with a lipidated formyl peptide receptor-like 1 inhibitory protein promoted the capture of various SARS-CoV-2 variants by DC [62]. Nasal formulations of innovative innate immune stimulators, including HeberNasvac, stimulate innate immune markers at sites of viral entry and systemic compartments (HLA class II in monocytes and lymphocytes) and activates DCs. These formulations are suitable for prophylaxis in high-risk groups, particularly the elderly and those at high risk of exposure to new variants with comorbidities. [63]COVID-19 may also cause DC cytopathy, reducing the number and effecting the function of DCs [64]. In this regard, a recently developed intranasal complex consisting of G5-BGG and antigen-expressing plasmid DNA induced antigen expression and dendritic cell maturation in the nasal mucosa exhibits the potential to serve as an effective carrier gene for intranasal vaccines [65]. Basophils can act as APCs and play a protective role against COVID-19. However, its underlying mechanisms and treatments are unknown [66].

Serum IgG and fecal IgA levels were significantly elevated after oral administration of recombinant Lactobacillus strains expressing potential antigenic determinants of spiny, membrane, and envelope proteins The carrier Lactobacillus also affected macrophage polarization and interacted with DCs for better epitope display [67]. Dendritic cells in the lung, specifically those expressing CD11b + and CD103 + , have the ability to promote the expression of a4b7 and CCR9 in T cells, facilitating T cell homing to the gastrointestinal tract. This mechanism is crucial for the recruitment and maintenance of chronic inflammatory diseases in the intestines. Research into the crosstalk between lung-associated dendritic cells and gut immunity has been explored in further studies [68, 69]. Additionally, DCs from aged mice exhibit reduced tolerance compared with DCs from young mice. In contrast, the tolerogenic function of DCs was successfully restored by introducing Lactobacillus plantarum into the intestines of aged mice. Therefore, the development of probiotic intestinal formulations will be helpful in improving immune responses to influenza vaccination and infection in elderly individuals [70].

bacterial infection

Tract infections, particularly lower respiratory tract infections, are a leading cause of death and disability, with S. pneumoniae being the major cause of lower respiratory tract infections [71]. There is concern regarding the increasing antibiotic resistance of S. pneumoniae. However, current guidelines indicate that most patients with community-acquired pneumonia can still be successfully treated with antibiotic regimens that have been in-use for decades [72]. However, drugresistant strains and the reduced effectiveness of existing vaccines complicate treatment, thus suggesting the need for continued research focused on new approaches [73]. The recombinant ABC protein SP0148 and its antiserum inhibited S. pneumoniae adhesion to human lung epithelial cells in a dose-dependent manner, produced a protective immune response against lethal doses of S. pneumoniae infection [74]. A novel lipidated adjuvant, the chitosan derivative OTMC, triggered the release of cytokines from DCs and produced IgG that also potentiated the immune response to the vaccine [75]. Pneumococcal surface protein A was expressed on the surfaces of all S. pneumoniae strains. The enzyme polymerized caffeic acid can be used as a serotype-independent universal nasal pneumococcal vaccine formulation, and vaccines constructed with Pneumococcal surface protein A triggers a specific antibody response against pneumococcal infection [76]. However, the detailed mechanisms of this response are poorly understood. It has been demonstrated that targeting the Fc receptor with a fusion protein comprising pneumococcal surface protein A and IgG polarizes alveolar macrophages to an AM1 phenotype and increases the regular DC subpopulation of the lungs while enhancing Th1 cytokines and specific IgG and IgA levels [77]. The lipopolysaccharide bioactive fraction, Bacillus alkaloidus-producing lipid A, acts as an adjuvant to a nasal vaccine against pneumococcal surface protein A that stimulates DC to promote the production of the mucosal immune-enhancing cytokines, IL-6 and BAFF, and the formation of germinal centers in the lymph nodes, ultimately resulting in high levels of specific IgA and IgG responses [78]. Lung DC CD103 + and lung DC CD24 + are able to proficiently induce high levels of IgA and B cells to home to the gut [79]. In contrast, the chemical binding of chitosan nanocapsules to S. pneumoniae surface protein A promotes DC maturation and antigen presentation, followed by peripheral blood mononuclear cells activation and lymphocyte differentiation [80]. Polysorbate transporter protein adjuvant induces DC and helper T cells responses using the PPAR- pathway, ultimately resulting in a long-term memory response. [81]. Most pathogenic isolates express pneumococcal hemolysin (PLY) and are required for virulence and host-to-host transmission, and immunosuppressive interactions between Ply with MRC-1 expressed on AMs have been demonstrated in an experimental mouse model of lower respiratory tract infection. This mechanism also enables pathogens to penetrate MRC-1-expressing M2-type Møs and DCs within MRC-1-encapsulated endosomes [82, 83]. A146Ply is a mutation in S. pneumoniae in which Ply is inactivated and intranasal administration significantly attenuates bacterial-induced iron death in lung tissue and macrophages as well as enhancing macrophage phagocytosis [84]. CDC is an important virulence factor of PLY. A peptide that could bind to the virulence factor was designed, using docking to identify the interaction site with MRC-1.In vitro experiments showed that these peptides blocked the production of inflammatory cytokines by human Møs, inhibited the uptake of bacteria by DCs through MRC-1, and prevented bacterial invasion into the epithelium in a 3D lung tissue model. Calcium phosphate nanoparticles have been developed as peptide nanocarriers in vivo and can be used as an adjunctive therapy alongside antibiotics. [85].

Vaccines formulated with STING-activated cyclic dinucleotide adjuvants induce CD4 + T cells that significantly protect against Mycobacterium tuberculosis [86]. The novel therapeutic DNA vaccine, rel Mtb, enhances specific T cell responses by increasing contact with immature DCs and exhibits maximal mycobacteriostatic activity in combination with isoniazid for intranasal administration as well as robust systemic and local Th1 and Th17 responses [87]. BAdv 85C5-infected DCs express a robust transcriptome of genes that regulate antigen processing, ultimately leading to T cell expansion [88]. The transmission of Mtb across the alveolar barrier involves the phagocytosis of inhaled bacteria by Ams, which then cross the alveolar barrier by exudation, a process known as the “Trojan horse” mechanism [89]. Møs are the first immune cells to encounter Mtb during an infection and serve as its main replicative ecosystem. The entry of Mtb into Møs through different receptors can activate different pathways that inhibit or promote bacterial replication; among these, the vitamin D pathway promotes the polarization of Mtb-infected human Møs to enhance bacterial killing [90, 91]. Unstructured lipid carrier (NLC)-incorporated linezolid targets macrophages in vitro and in vivo with potent clinical efficacy against drug-resistant tuberculosis [92].

Type 2 diabetes mellitus affects antigen presentation after tuberculosis infection, and the kinetics of Mtb peptide-MHC II complex formation in human monocytederived Møs are reduced at high glucose concentrations, thereby decreasing their ability to activate T cells. Nanoparticles containing all-trans retinoic acid in hostdirected therapy are used to treat patients with M. tuberculosis or diabetic tuberculosis by targeting macrophages [93,94,95].

Malignancy

KRAS mutations are targets for immunotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer, and intranasal immunization with nanoemulsion adjuvants combined with KRAS peptides enhance KRAS-specific Th1 and Th17 responses as well as reduce tumor incidence [96]. A study using DC therapy to target various tumor-associated antigens for lung cancer treatment was initiated by Kontani et al. In this study, mature DCs loaded with the MUC1 peptide were injected into the supraclavicular region three times at 2-week intervals [97]. The patients experienced a reduction in tumor size or tumor marker levels, suggesting that a DC vaccine targeting MUC1 could be used for cancer immunotherapy. Recently studied MUC -1 PLGA-NA-NPs are being explored as potential candidates for investigating the antitumor effects in NSCLC xenograft models through inhalation [98]. The hr-8-PLGA@Ag/CpG nanovaccine specifically binds to the endocytic receptor DEC-205, which is mainly found on cDC1, promoting dendritic cell maturation and increasing antigen cross-presentation. This process ultimately boosts immune responses against tumors mediated by CD8 + T cells [99]. Squalenebased nanoemulsions at 0.1%, alter mucosal characteristics and induce broad-spectrum antigenspecific cellular immunity after intranasal vaccination. [100] mPLA/mRNA tumor vaccines by stimulating DC maturation, reprogramming of M2 macrophages into M1 macrophages, and crossactivation of innate and adaptive immune responses, ultimately providing ideas and perspectives for mRNA tumor vaccine applications in lung cancer and bone metastases treatment [101]. Intranasal administration of ECF with fucoidan promoted the activation of DCs, natural killer cells, and T cells in mLNs, which is used in immunotherapy to treat metastatic lung cancer [102].

Conclusion

New vaccine developments, adjuvants, and immunization strategies have gradually increased the potential of mucosal vaccines. However, the role of mucosal barriers and vaccine safety has not been effectively identified. Therefore, efforts should still be made to explore effective alternatives. Several factors such as antigens, formulations, routes of administration, adjuvants, animal models, and other factors should be considered for the development of safe and effective mucosal vaccines [103]. Most mucosal immunity is directed against plasma and epithelial cells as well as against crosstalk between DCs and macrophages. In addition, although there are few studies on other APC-based therapies, different classes of APCs elicit different immune responses to pathogens and have distinct mechanisms of action. Understanding their mechanisms of action is beneficial for exploring the potential roles of APCs in lung diseases, which may provide important insights into more effective therapeutic approaches for a wide range of conditions, from chronic to infectious lung diseases. However, APC-based therapies for lung diseases are still in the developmental stage. Most of the vaccination studies have introduced new treatment concepts but have not yet demonstrated significant clinical benefits and low toxicity. Therefore, further research is required to validate these findings.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Tognarelli EI, Bueno SM, González PA. Immune-Modulation by the Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus: Focus on Dendritic Cells. Front Immunol. 2019;10.

  2. Eisenbarth SC. Dendritic cell subsets in T cell programming: location dictates function. Nat Rev Immunol. 2019;19:89–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang Z, Wang Y, Xia L, Zhang Y. Roles of critical amino acids metabolism in the interactions between intracellular bacterial infection and macrophage function. Curr Microbiol. 2024;81:280.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Luan H, Horng T. Dynamic changes in macrophage metabolism modulate induction and suppression of Type I inflammatory responses. Curr Opin Immunol. 2021;73:9–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vermaelen K, Pauwels R. Pulmonary dendritic cells. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;172:530–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Harryvan TJ, De Lange S, Hawinkels LJAC, Verdegaal EME. The ABCs of antigen presentation by stromal non-professional antigen-presenting cells. IJMS. 2021;23:137.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Rastogi I, Jeon D, Moseman JE, Muralidhar A, Potluri HK, McNeel DG. Role of B cells as antigen presenting cells. Front Immunol. 2022;13:954936.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kotsias F, Cebrian I, Alloatti A. Antigen processing and presentation. In: International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology. Elsevier; 2019. p. 69–121.

  9. Fortuna A, Schindowski K, Sonvico F. Editorial: Intranasal Drug Delivery: Challenges and Opportunities. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13.

  10. Kurono Y. The mucosal immune system of the upper respiratory tract and recent progress in mucosal vaccines. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2022;49:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nian X, Zhang J, Huang S, Duan K, Li X, Yang X. Development of nasal vaccines and the associated challenges. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:1983.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Piñero P, Marco De La Calle FM, Horndler L, Alarcón B, Uribe Barrientos M, Sarmiento H, et al. Flow cytometry detection of sustained humoral immune response (IgG + IgA) against native spike glycoprotein in asymptomatic/mild SARS-CoV-2 infection. Sci Rep. 2021;11:10716.

  13. Lavelle EC, Ward RW. Mucosal vaccines - fortifying the frontiers. Nat Rev Immunol. 2022;22:236–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Baker JR, Farazuddin M, Wong PT, O’Konek JJ. The unfulfilled potential of mucosal immunization. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022;150:1–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sarkar I, Garg R, van Drunen Littel-van den Hurk S. Selection of adjuvants for vaccines targeting specific pathogens. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2019;18:505–21.

  16. He X, Chen X, Wang H, Du G, Sun X. Recent advances in respiratory immunization: A focus on COVID-19 vaccines. J Control Release. 2023;355:655–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kehagia E, Papakyriakopoulou P, Valsami G. Advances in intranasal vaccine delivery: A promising non-invasive route of immunization. Vaccine. 2023;41:3589–603.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. von Mutius E, Smits HH. Primary prevention of asthma: from risk and protective factors to targeted strategies for prevention. Lancet. 2020;396:854–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hellings PW, Steelant B. Epithelial barriers in allergy and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;145:1499–509.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Shao Y, Saredy J, Yang WY, Sun Y, Lu Y, Saaoud F, et al. Vascular Endothelial Cells and Innate Immunity. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020;40:e138–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Osorio-Valencia S, Zhou B. Roles of Macrophages and Endothelial Cells and Their Crosstalk in Acute Lung Injury. Biomedicines. 2024;12:632.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hammad H, Lambrecht BN. The basic immunology of asthma. Cell. 2021;184:1469–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kuruvilla ME, Lee FE-H, Lee GB. Understanding asthma phenotypes, endotypes, and mechanisms of disease. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2019;56:219–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Izumi G, Nakano H, Nakano K, Whitehead GS, Grimm SA, Fessler MB, et al. CD11b+ lung dendritic cells at different stages of maturation induce Th17 or Th2 differentiation. Nat Commun. 2021;12:5029.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu S, Verma M, Michalec L, Liu W, Sripada A, Rollins D, et al. Steroid resistance of airway type 2 innate lymphoid cells from patients with severe asthma: The role of thymic stromal lymphopoietin. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;141:257-268.e6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Xu L, Tudor D, Bomsel M. The Protective HIV-1 Envelope gp41 Antigen P1 Acts as a Mucosal Adjuvant Stimulating the Innate Immunity. Front Immunol. 2021 Cited 2024 Aug 9;11. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/immunology/articles/https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fimmu.2020.599278/full

  27. Sakae H, Ogiso Y, Matsuda M, Shimora H, Deering T, Fox TE, et al. Ceramide nanoliposomes as potential therapeutic reagents for asthma. Cells. 2023;12:591.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Moon H-G, Kim S, Lee MK, Kang H, Choi HS, Harijith A, et al. Colony-stimulating factor 1 and its receptor are new potential therapeutic targets for allergic asthma. Allergy. 2020;75:357–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhong Y, Su C, Wu S, Miao C, Wang B. Nasal delivery of an immunotherapeutic vaccine in thermosensitive hydrogel against allergic asthma. Int Immunopharmacol. 2023;116:109718.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pivniouk V, Gimenes-Junior JA, Ezeh P, Michael A, Pivniouk O, Hahn S, et al. Airway administration of OM-85, a bacterial lysate, blocks experimental asthma by targeting dendritic cells and the epithelium/IL-33/ILC2 axis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022;149:943–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Manna S, McAuley J, Jacobson J, Nguyen CD, Ullah A, Sebina I, et al. Synergism and Antagonism of Bacterial-Viral Coinfection in the Upper Respiratory Tract. 2022;7.

  32. David SC, Norton T, Tyllis T, Wilson JJ, Singleton EV, Laan Z, et al. Direct interaction of whole-inactivated influenza A and pneumococcal vaccines enhances influenza-specific immunity. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:1316–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Desheva Y, Leontieva G, Kramskaya T, Grabovskaya KB, Karev V, Mamontov A, et al. Mucosal vaccine based on attenuated influenza virus and the group B Streptococcus recombinant peptides protected mice from influenza and S. pneumoniae infections. Plos One. 2019;14:e0218544.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Rosas-Salazar C, Chirkova T, Gebretsadik T, Chappell JD, Peebles RS, Dupont WD, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus infection during infancy and asthma during childhood in the USA (INSPIRE): a population-based, prospective birth cohort study. The Lancet. 2023;401:1669–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tognarelli EI, Bueno SM, González PA. Immune-Modulation by the Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus: Focus on Dendritic Cells. Front Immunol. 2019 Cited 2024 Jul 21;10. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/immunology/articles/https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00810/full

  36. Del Prete A, Locati M, Otero K, Riboldi E, Mantovani A, Vecchi A, et al. Migration of dendritic cells across blood and lymphatic endothelial barriers. Thromb Haemost. 2006;95:22–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jung HE, Kim TH, Lee HK. Contribution of dendritic cells in protective immunity against respiratory syncytial virus infection. Viruses. 2020;12:102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Manna S, McAuley J, Jacobson J, Nguyen CD, Ullah MA, Sebina I, et al. Nanoparticle formulation of the fusion protein virus like particles of respiratory syncytial virus stimulates enhanced in vitro antigen presentation and autophagy. mSphere. 2022;7:e0098421.

  39. Sharma P, Levy O, Dowling DJ. The TLR5 agonist flagellin shapes phenotypical and functional activation of lung mucosal antigen presenting cells in neonatal mice. Front Immunol. 2020;11:171.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Sasaki E, Asanuma H, Momose H, Furuhata K, Mizukami T, Matsumura T, et al. Systemically inoculated adjuvants stimulate pDC-dependent IgA response in local site. Mucosal Immunol. 2023;16:275–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kawasaki T, Ikegawa M, Yunoki K, Otani H, Ori D, Ishii KJ, et al. Alveolar macrophages instruct CD8+ T cell expansion by antigen cross-presentation in lung. Cell Rep. 2022;41:111828.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hemann EA, Green R, Turnbull JB, Langlois RA, Savan R, Gale M. Interferon-λ modulates dendritic cells to facilitate T cell immunity during infection with influenza A virus. Nat Immunol. 2019;20:1035–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Si Y, Wang Y, Tian Q, Wang Q, Pollard JM, Srivastava PK, et al. Lung cDC1 and cDC2 dendritic cells priming naive CD8+ T cells in situ prior to migration to draining lymph nodes. Cell Rep. 2023;42:113299.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Johansen F-E, Kaetzel CS. Regulation of the polymeric immunoglobulin receptor and IgA transport: new advances in environmental factors that stimulate pIgR expression and its role in mucosal immunity. Mucosal Immunol. 2011;4:598–602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Qin T, Ma S, Miao X, Tang Y, Huangfu D, Wang J, et al. Mucosal vaccination for influenza protection enhanced by catalytic immune-adjuvant. Adv Sci. 2020;7:2000771.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Yin Y, Wang J, Xu X, Zhou B, Chen S, Qin T, et al. Riboflavin as a mucosal adjuvant for nasal influenza vaccine. Vaccines (Basel). 2021;9:1296.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Oh JE, Song E, Moriyama M, Wong P, Zhang S, Jiang R, et al. Intranasal priming induces local lung-resident B cell populations that secrete protective mucosal antiviral IgA. Sci Immunol. 2021;6:eabj5129.

  48. Ochsner SP, Li W, Rajendrakumar AM, Palaniyandi S, Acharya G, Liu X, et al. FcRn-targeted mucosal vaccination against influenza virus infection. J Immunol. 2021;207:1310–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kayraklioglu N, Horuluoglu B, Klinman DM. CpG Oligonucleotides as Vaccine Adjuvants. In: Sousa Â, editor. DNA Vaccines [Internet]. New York, NY: Springer US; 2021 [cited 2024 Aug 13]. p. 51–85. Available from: https://link.springer.com/https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/978-1-0716-0872-2_4

  50. Dong C, Wang Y, Gonzalez GX, Ma Y, Song Y, Wang S, et al. Intranasal vaccination with influenza HA/GO-PEI nanoparticles provides immune protection against homo- and heterologous strains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118:e2024998118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Chakraborty S, Cheng BY-L, Edwards DL, Gonzalez JC, Chiu DK-C, Zheng H, et al. Sialylated IgG induces the transcription factor REST in alveolar macrophages to protect against lung inflammation and severe influenza disease. Immunity. 2025;58:182–196.e10.

  52. Sasaki E, Asanuma H, Momose H, Furuhata K, Mizukami T, Hamaguchi I. Nasal alum-adjuvanted vaccine promotes IL-33 release from alveolar epithelial cells that elicits IgA production via type 2 immune responses. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17:e1009890.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Shamseldin MM, Kenney A, Zani A, Evans JP, Zeng C, Read KA, et al. Prime-Pull Immunization of Mice with a BcfA-Adjuvanted Vaccine Elicits Sustained Mucosal Immunity That Prevents SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Pathology. J Immunol. 2023;210:1257–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Lu Y, Liu G. Nano alum: A new solution to the new challenge. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022;18:2060667.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Lawanprasert A, Simonson AW, Sumner SE, Nicol MJ, Pimcharoen S, Kirimanjeswara GS, et al. Inhalable SARS-CoV-2 Mimetic Particles Induce Pleiotropic Antigen Presentation. Biomacromol. 2022;23:1158–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Kim S-H, Shim E-H, Kim D-J, Jang Y-S. C5aR+ dendritic cells fine-tune the Peyer’s patch microenvironment to induce antigen-specific CD8+ T cells. npj Vaccines. 2023;8:1–11.

  57. Dai L, Gao GF. Viral targets for vaccines against COVID-19. Nat Rev Immunol. 2021;21:73–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Adam A, Shi Q, Wang B, Zou J, Mai J, Osman SR, et al. A modified porous silicon microparticle potentiates protective systemic and mucosal immunity for SARS-CoV-2 subunit vaccine. Transl Res. 2022;249:13–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Cheang NYZ, Tan KS, Tan PS, Purushotorma K, Yap WC, Tullett KM, et al. Single-shot dendritic cell targeting SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate induces broad, durable and protective systemic and mucosal immunity in mice. Mol Ther. 2024;32:2299–315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Lee J, Khang D. Mucosal delivery of nanovaccine strategy against COVID-19 and its variants. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2022;13:2897–925.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Billet A, Hadjerci J, Tran T, Kessler P, Ulmer J, Mourier G, et al. A synthetic delivery vector for mucosal vaccination. Biomaterials. 2023;302:122298.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Hsieh M-S, Hsu C-W, Liao H-C, Lin C-L, Chiang C-Y, Chen M-Y, et al. SARS-CoV-2 spike-FLIPr fusion protein plus lipidated FLIPr protects against various SARS-CoV-2 variants in hamsters. J Virol. 2024;98:e0154623.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Aguilar-Rubido JC, Pentón-Arias E, Akbar SMF. Innate immune stimulation should not be overlooked in post-exposure prophylaxis and early therapy for coronavirus infections. MEDICC Rev. 2022;24:70–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Wang X, Guan F, Miller H, Byazrova MG, Cndotti F, Benlagha K, et al. The role of dendritic cells in COVID-19 infection. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2023;12:2195019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Zhang H, Liu Z, Lihe H, Lu L, Zhang Z, Yang S, et al. Intranasal G5-BGG/pDNA Vaccine Elicits Protective Systemic and Mucosal Immunity against SARS-CoV-2 by Transfecting Mucosal Dendritic Cells. Adv Healthcare Materials. 2024;13:2303261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Murdaca G, Di Gioacchino M, Greco M, Borro M, Paladin F, Petrarca C, et al. Basophils and Mast Cells in COVID-19 Pathogenesis. Cells. 2021;10:2754.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Hwang I-C, Valeriano VD, Song JH, Pereira M, Oh JK, Han K, et al. Mucosal immunization with lactiplantibacillus plantarum-displaying recombinant SARS-CoV-2 epitopes on the surface induces humoral and mucosal immune responses in mice. Microb Cell Fact. 2023;22:96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Ruane D, Brane L, Reis BS, Cheong C, Poles J, Do Y, et al. Lung dendritic cells induce migration of protective T cells to the gastrointestinal tract. J Exp Med. 2013;210:1871–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Collins CB, Rivera-Nieves J. Broadening the paradigm of mucosal dendritic cell-mediated induction of gut-homing on T cells. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:854–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Malik JA, Zafar MA, Lamba T, Nanda S, Khan MA, Agrewala JN. The impact of aging-induced gut microbiome dysbiosis on dendritic cells and lung diseases. Gut Microbes. 2023;15:2290643.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Safiri S, Mahmoodpoor A, Kolahi A-A, Nejadghaderi SA, Sullman MJM, Mansournia MA, et al. Global burden of lower respiratory infections during the last three decades. Front Public Health. 2022;10:1028525.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Metlay JP, Waterer GW, Long AC, Anzueto A, Brozek J, Crothers K, et al. Diagnosis and Treatment of Adults with Community-acquired Pneumonia. An Official Clinical Practice Guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200:e45–67.

  73. Li L, Ma J, Yu Z, Li M, Zhang W, Sun H. Epidemiological characteristics and antibiotic resistance mechanisms of Streptococcus pneumoniae: An updated review. Microbiol Res. 2023;266:127221.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Huang J, Luo S, Huang M, Zhang T, Min Z, Liu C, et al. Protection against fatal pneumonia through mucosal and subcutaneous immunization with the pneumococcal SP0148 protein. Microb Pathog. 2019;129:206–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Yang J, Boer JC, Khongkow M, Phunpee S, Khalil ZG, Bashiri S, et al. The development of surface-modified liposomes as an intranasal delivery system for group a streptococcus vaccines. Vaccines. 2023;11:305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Tada R, Suzuki H, Ogasawara M, Yamanaka D, Adachi Y, Kunisawa J, et al. Polymeric caffeic acid acts as a nasal vaccine formulation against streptococcus pneumoniae infections in mice. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:585.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Wiedinger K, McCauley J, Bitsaktsis C. Isotype-specific outcomes in Fc gamma receptor targeting of PspA using fusion proteins as a vaccination strategy against Streptococcus pneumoniae infection. Vaccine. 2020;38:5634–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Yoshii K, Hosomi K, Shimoyama A, Wang Y, Yamaura H, Nagatake T, et al. Chemically Synthesized Alcaligenes Lipid A Shows a Potent and Safe Nasal Vaccine Adjuvant Activity for the Induction of Streptococcus pneumoniae-Specific IgA and Th17 Mediated Protective Immunity. Microorganisms. 2020;8:1102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Ruane D, Chorny A, Lee H, Faith J, Pandey G, Shan M, et al. Microbiota regulate the ability of lung dendritic cells to induce IgA class-switch recombination and generate protective gastrointestinal immune responses. J Exp Med. 2016;213:53–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Robla S, Prasanna M, Varela-Calviño R, Grandjean C, Csaba N. A chitosan-based nanosystem as pneumococcal vaccine delivery platform. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2021;11:581–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Kye Y-C, Park S-M, Shim B-S, Firdous J, Kim G, Kim HW, et al. Intranasal immunization with pneumococcal surface protein A in the presence of nanoparticle forming polysorbitol transporter adjuvant induces protective immunity against the Streptococcus pneumoniae infection. Acta Biomater. 2019;90:362–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Xu S, Mo D, Rizvi FZ, Rosa JP, Ruiz J, Tan S, et al. Pore-forming activity of S. pneumoniae pneumolysin disrupts the paracellular localization of the epithelial adherens junction protein E-cadherin. Infect Immun. 2023;91:e0021323.

  83. Anderson R, Feldman C. The global burden of community-acquired pneumonia in adults, encompassing invasive pneumococcal disease and the prevalence of its associated cardiovascular events, with a focus on pneumolysin and macrolide antibiotics in pathogenesis and therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:11038.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Yuan Y, Xu W, Li L, Guo T, Liu B, Xiao J, et al. A Streptococcus pneumoniae endolysin mutant protein ΔA146Ply elicits rapid broad-spectrum mucosal protection in mice via upregulation of GPX4 through TLR4/IRG1/NRF2 to alleviate macrophage ferroptosis. Free Radical Biol Med. 2024;222:344–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Subramanian K, Iovino F, Tsikourkitoudi V, Merkl P, Ahmed S, Berry SB, et al. Mannose receptor-derived peptides neutralize pore-forming toxins and reduce inflammation and development of pneumococcal disease. EMBO Mol Med. 2020;12:e12695.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Jong RM, Van Dis E, Berry SB, Nguyenla X, Baltodano A, Pastenkos G, et al. Mucosal Vaccination with Cyclic Dinucleotide Adjuvants Induces Effective T Cell Homing and IL-17-Dependent Protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection. J Immunol. 2022;208:407–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Karanika S, Gordy JT, Neupane P, Karantanos T, Ruelas Castillo J, Quijada D, et al. An intranasal stringent response vaccine targeting dendritic cells as a novel adjunctive therapy against tuberculosis. Front Immunol. 2022;13:972266.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Khan A, Sayedahmed EE, Singh VK, Mishra A, Dorta-Estremera S, Nookala S, et al. A recombinant bovine adenoviral mucosal vaccine expressing mycobacterial antigen-85B generates robust protection against tuberculosis in mice. Cell Rep Med. 2021;2:100372.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Nguyen L, Pieters J. The Trojan horse: survival tactics of pathogenic mycobacteria in macrophages. Trends Cell Biol. 2005;15:269–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Sia JK, Rengarajan J. Immunology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infections. Microbiol Spectr. 2019;7.

  91. Rao Muvva J, Parasa VR, Lerm M, Svensson M, Brighenti S. Polarization of Human Monocyte-Derived Cells With Vitamin D Promotes Control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection. Front Immunol. 2019;10:3157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Makled S, Boraie N, Nafee N. Nanoparticle-mediated macrophage targeting—a new inhalation therapy tackling tuberculosis. Drug Deliv and Transl Res. 2021;11:1037–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Monroy-Mérida G, Guzmán-Beltrán S, Hernández F, Santos-Mendoza T, Bobadilla K. High Glucose Concentrations Impair the Processing and Presentation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Antigens In Vitro. Biomolecules. 2021;11:1763.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Zhao L, Fan K, Sun X, Li W, Qin F, Shi L, et al. Host-directed therapy against mycobacterium tuberculosis infections with diabetes mellitus. Front Immunol. 2024 [cited 2024 Jul 28];14. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/immunology/articles/https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1305325/full

  95. Bahlool AZ, Fattah S, O’Sullivan A, Cavanagh B, MacLoughlin R, Keane J, et al. Development of Inhalable ATRA-Loaded PLGA Nanoparticles as Host-Directed Immunotherapy against Tuberculosis. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:1745.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Wang SH, Cao Z, Farazuddin M, Chen J, Janczak KW, Tang S, et al. A novel intranasal peptide vaccine inhibits non-small cell lung cancer with KRAS mutation. Cancer Gene Ther. 2024 [cited 2024 Aug 12]; Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41417-023-00717-9

  97. Kontani K, Taguchi O, Ozaki Y, Hanaoka J, Sawai S, Inoue S, et al. Dendritic cell vaccine immunotherapy of cancer targeting MUC1 mucin. Int J Mol Med. 2003;12:493–502.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Jyoti K, Jain S, Katare OP, Katyal A, Chandra R, Madan J. Non-small cell lung cancer tumour antigen, MUC-1 peptide-loaded non-aggregated poly (lactide- co -glycolide) nanoparticles augmented cellular uptake in mouse professional antigen-presenting cells: optimisation and characterisation. J Microencapsul. 2020;37:14–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Zheng J, Wang M, Pang L, Wang S, Kong Y, Zhu X, et al. Identification of a novel DEC-205 binding peptide to develop dendritic cell-targeting nanovaccine for cancer immunotherapy. J Control Release. 2024;373:568–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Huang C-H, Huang C-Y, Ho H-M, Lee C-H, Lai P-T, Wu S-C, et al. Nanoemulsion adjuvantation strategy of tumor-associated antigen therapy rephrases mucosal and immunotherapeutic signatures following intranasal vaccination. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8:e001022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Ma S, Li X, Mai Y, Guo J, Zuo W, Yang J. Immunotherapeutic treatment of lung cancer and bone metastasis with a mPLA/mRNA tumor vaccine. Acta Biomater. 2023;169:489–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Zhang W, Hwang J, Yadav D, An E-K, Kwak M, Lee PC-W, et al. Enhancement of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Mediated Anti-Cancer Immunity by Intranasal Treatment of Ecklonia cava Fucoidan against Metastatic Lung Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:9125.

  103. Li M, Wang Y, Sun Y, Cui H, Zhu SJ, Qiu H-J. Mucosal vaccines: Strategies and challenges. Immunol Lett. 2020;217:116–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

No external funding was received for this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: ZC and WH; Administrative support: WH; Collection and assembly of data: ZC, YL; Data analysis and interpretation: ZC and YL; Drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content: All authors; Final approval of manuscript: All authors; Accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved: All authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weizhe Huang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Chen, Z., Cheng, H. et al. Mucosal immunotherapy targeting APC in lung disease. J Inflamm 22, 15 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12950-025-00432-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12950-025-00432-2

Keywords